Taking guns away from mentally ill won't eliminate mass shootings, psychiatrist says ~ hiv virus

A string of public mass shootings during the past decade-plus have rocked America leaving policymakers and mental health experts alike fishing for solutions to prevent these heinous crimes. A Mayo Clinic physician, however, argues that at least one proposal won't stop the public massacres: restricting gun access to the mentally ill. J. Michael Bostwick, M.D., a Mayo Clinic psychiatrist and author of the editorial published online in Mayo Clinic Proceedings today, argues several points including that mass shootings are carefully planned—often spanning weeks or months. There is plenty of time for a meticulous planner and determined killer to get a gun somewhere in that time, he argues.

Dr. Bostwick's editorial is a commentary on an essay in the same issue of Proceedings titled "Guns, Schools, and Mental Illness: Potential Concerns for Physicians and Mental Health Professionals." The authors focus on recent mass shootings and argue that these actions were not and could not have been prevented by more restrictive gun legislation. They further contend that a diagnosis of mental illness does not justify stripping Second Amendment rights from all who carry such a diagnosis, most of whom will never commit violent acts toward others.

Before reading the essay Dr. Bostwick—who is generally in favor of gun control—expected to disagree with its contents. Instead, he agreed.

"We physicians generally do not know enough about firearms to have an informed conversation with our patients, let alone counsel them about gun safety," says Dr. Bostwick. "We also tend to ignore the reality that as long as the Second Amendment is the law of the land, the right to bear arms and therefore personal gun ownership, whether of long guns for hunting or handguns for personal protection, will be an integral part of the American scene."

A few points Dr. Bostwick argues:

Even if every mentally ill person in the country were registered, the system isn't prepared to handle them—and only about half of the states require registration.

Only about 10 percent of mentally ill people are registered—and these are people who have been committed, they've come to attention in a way that requires court intervention.

Literature says the vast majority of people who do these kinds of shootings are not mentally ill—or it is recognized after the fact.

The majority of mentally ill people aren't dangerous.

Mentally ill people in a country with gun rights, still have rights.

Mass shootings are not just an American phenomenon—they have and are occurring in countries that have strong gun control.

"It is important to note that mass shooting are very different from murder and suicide," Dr. Bostwick says. "These conclusions should not be extrapolated either to other forms of murder—often crimes of passion in which there is typically only a single victim—or to suicide, a phenomenon that is more than twice as common as homicide in the United States and frequently an impulsive act. Research shows gun restriction among suicidal people works."

Explore further: Media coverage of mass shootings contributes to negative attitudes towards mental illness

Medical Xpress on facebook

Recommended for you

New research warns against Wi-Fi in cars

12 minutes ago

Plans to provide high-speed Internet access in vehicles, announced last month by Canadian telecommunications company Rogers Communications and American provider Sprint Corporation, could do with some sobering second-thought, ...

Low-voiced men love 'em and leave 'em, yet still attract more women, study says

1 hour ago

Men with low-pitched voices have an advantage in attracting women, even though women know they're not likely to stick around for long.

Scientists explain why having more money doesn't make us happier

2 hours ago

(Medical Xpress)—Living standards have risen significantly in the developed world over the past 50 years, so why aren't we happier than our grandparents?

Tip-of-the-tongue moments may be benign

9 hours ago

Despite the common fear that those annoying tip-of-the-tongue moments are signals of age-related memory decline, the two phenomena appear to be independent, according to findings published in Psychological Science, a jour ...

New article reveals why people with depression may struggle with parenthood

16 hours ago

An article by researchers at the University of Exeter has shed light on the link between depression and poor parenting. The article identifies the symptoms of depression that are likely to cause difficulties with parenting. ...

Veterans with Gulf War Illness show brain changes linked to memory deficits

19 hours ago

New research illuminates definitive brain alterations in troops with Gulf War Illness (GWI) thought to result from the exposure to neurotoxic chemicals, including sarin gas, during the first Persian Gulf War.

User comments

Disclaimer

Home

Psychology & Psychiatry

October 16, 2013

Before reading the essay Dr. Bostwick—who is generally in favor of gun control—expected to disagree with its contents. Instead, he agreed.

A few points Dr. Bostwick argues:

Even if every mentally ill person in the country were registered, the system isn't prepared to handle them—and only about half of the states require registration.

Only about 10 percent of mentally ill people are registered—and these are people who have been committed, they've come to attention in a way that requires court intervention.

Literature says the vast majority of people who do these kinds of shootings are not mentally ill—or it is recognized after the fact.

The majority of mentally ill people aren't dangerous.

Mentally ill people in a country with gun rights, still have rights.

Mass shootings are not just an American phenomenon—they have and are occurring in countries that have strong gun control.

Explore further: Media coverage of mass shootings contributes to negative attitudes towards mental illness