Wednesday, 7 May 2014

ARRS: Women overestimate radiation risk from mammogram



ARRS: women overestimate radiation risk from mammogram


(HealthDay)—Women tend to overestimate the radiation risk associated with mammography, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society, held from May 4 to 9 in San Diego.


Jacqueline Hollada, from the University of California in Los Angeles, and colleagues surveyed 133 women presenting for annual mammography during a three-month period to ascertain their knowledge of the ionizing radiation associated with breast imaging. Participants were asked to rate the amount of radiation in a single mammogram relative to a series of radiation benchmarks. Five benchmarks were chosen to provide an approximately logarithmic scale with the value of a mammogram at the center (0.4 mSv). The benchmarks were ranked according to radiation, with 1 the highest and 6 the lowest.


The researchers found that none of the 78 women who responded to the benchmark question ranked all six radiation benchmarks correctly. Women overestimated the radiation associated with a mammogram compared with the other benchmarks. The correct rank for mammogram was 3.5, which was significantly different from the average rank given of 2.9 (standard deviation, 1.2; P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference among those with or without college education, or for those reporting that they had or had not received sufficient explanation.


"Using everyday sources of as benchmarks can help add perspective and improve patients' understanding of levels associated with mammography, thereby reducing anxiety related to the examination," Hollada said in a statement.


More information: Abstract

More Information


Copyright © 2014 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Medical Xpress on facebook

Related Stories


Mammogram most effective 12 months after radiation treatment


Nov 25, 2008



Breast cancer patients who receive breast-conserving therapy and radiation do not need a follow-up mammogram until 12 months after radiation, despite current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and National Comprehensive ...



Diagnostic chest radiation before 30 may increase breast cancer risk


Sep 06, 2012



Women carrying a mutation in the BRCA1- or BRCA2- genes (which control the suppression of breast and ovarian cancer) who have undergone diagnostic radiation to the chest before the age of 30 are more likely to develop breast ...



Scatter radiation from mammography presents no cancer risk


Nov 27, 2012



The radiation dose to areas of the body near the breast during mammography is negligible, or very low, and does not result in an increased risk of cancer, according to a study presented today at the annual meeting of the ...



Digital mammography delivers significantly less radiation than conventional mammography


Jan 21, 2010



Data from one of the largest mammography trials in history demonstrates that overall the radiation dose associated with digital mammography is significantly lower (averaging 22 percent lower) than that of conventional film ...



3D technology takes next step beyond traditional mammography


Apr 20, 2012



MILWAUKEE - After already having been through breast cancer treatment, Michelle Luckiesh did not think twice when doctors at Waukesha Memorial Hospital told her they had a new mammography device that may be able to detect ...



Recommended for you




Regular doctor visits may greatly diminish skin cancer deaths


1 hour ago



The risk of dying from the most dangerous type of skin cancer is significantly reduced with regular doctor visits, according to a Henry Ford Hospital study.





Researchers use DNA to build tool that may literally shine light on cancer


2 hours ago



Bioengineers at the University of Rome Tor Vergata and the University of Montreal have used DNA to develop a tool that detects and reacts to chemical changes caused by cancer cells and that may one day be ...





Ability to isolate and grow breast tissue stem cells could speed cancer research


4 hours ago



(Medical Xpress)—By carefully controlling the levels of two proteins, researchers at the Salk Institute have discovered how to keep mammary stem cells—those that can form breast tissue—alive and functioni ...



Study confirms clinical benefit for interleukin-2 immunotherapy in patients with advanced kidney cancer


4 hours ago



(Medical Xpress)—A retrospective study published online ahead of print in the medical journal Urology by a physician team from Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) found that patients with metastatic kidney cancer—even ...



Researchers discover 'bad' cholesterol contributes to cancer spread in the body


6 hours ago



(Medical Xpress)—In a world-first, University of Sydney researchers have discovered one of the main reasons behind why cancer spreads throughout the body - the help of 'bad' cholesterol.





A molecular target may lead to drug to fight leukaemia


6 hours ago



(Medical Xpress)—A molecular 'target' that could lead to a drug to fight leukaemia is in the sights of a team of University of Queensland researchers.



User comments







ARRS: women overestimate radiation risk from mammogram


(HealthDay)—Women tend to overestimate the radiation risk associated with mammography, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Roentgen Ray Society, held from May 4 to 9 in San Diego.


Jacqueline Hollada, from the University of California in Los Angeles, and colleagues surveyed 133 women presenting for annual mammography during a three-month period to ascertain their knowledge of the ionizing radiation associated with breast imaging. Participants were asked to rate the amount of radiation in a single mammogram relative to a series of radiation benchmarks. Five benchmarks were chosen to provide an approximately logarithmic scale with the value of a mammogram at the center (0.4 mSv). The benchmarks were ranked according to radiation, with 1 the highest and 6 the lowest.


The researchers found that none of the 78 women who responded to the benchmark question ranked all six radiation benchmarks correctly. Women overestimated the radiation associated with a mammogram compared with the other benchmarks. The correct rank for mammogram was 3.5, which was significantly different from the average rank given of 2.9 (standard deviation, 1.2; P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference among those with or without college education, or for those reporting that they had or had not received sufficient explanation.


"Using everyday sources of as benchmarks can help add perspective and improve patients' understanding of levels associated with mammography, thereby reducing anxiety related to the examination," Hollada said in a statement.


More information: Abstract

More Information


Copyright © 2014 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Medical Xpress on facebook

Related Stories


Mammogram most effective 12 months after radiation treatment


Nov 25, 2008



Breast cancer patients who receive breast-conserving therapy and radiation do not need a follow-up mammogram until 12 months after radiation, despite current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and National Comprehensive ...



Diagnostic chest radiation before 30 may increase breast cancer risk


Sep 06, 2012



Women carrying a mutation in the BRCA1- or BRCA2- genes (which control the suppression of breast and ovarian cancer) who have undergone diagnostic radiation to the chest before the age of 30 are more likely to develop breast ...



Scatter radiation from mammography presents no cancer risk


Nov 27, 2012



The radiation dose to areas of the body near the breast during mammography is negligible, or very low, and does not result in an increased risk of cancer, according to a study presented today at the annual meeting of the ...



Digital mammography delivers significantly less radiation than conventional mammography


Jan 21, 2010



Data from one of the largest mammography trials in history demonstrates that overall the radiation dose associated with digital mammography is significantly lower (averaging 22 percent lower) than that of conventional film ...



3D technology takes next step beyond traditional mammography


Apr 20, 2012



MILWAUKEE - After already having been through breast cancer treatment, Michelle Luckiesh did not think twice when doctors at Waukesha Memorial Hospital told her they had a new mammography device that may be able to detect ...



Recommended for you




Regular doctor visits may greatly diminish skin cancer deaths


1 hour ago



The risk of dying from the most dangerous type of skin cancer is significantly reduced with regular doctor visits, according to a Henry Ford Hospital study.





Researchers use DNA to build tool that may literally shine light on cancer


2 hours ago



Bioengineers at the University of Rome Tor Vergata and the University of Montreal have used DNA to develop a tool that detects and reacts to chemical changes caused by cancer cells and that may one day be ...





Ability to isolate and grow breast tissue stem cells could speed cancer research


4 hours ago



(Medical Xpress)—By carefully controlling the levels of two proteins, researchers at the Salk Institute have discovered how to keep mammary stem cells—those that can form breast tissue—alive and functioni ...



Study confirms clinical benefit for interleukin-2 immunotherapy in patients with advanced kidney cancer


4 hours ago



(Medical Xpress)—A retrospective study published online ahead of print in the medical journal Urology by a physician team from Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) found that patients with metastatic kidney cancer—even ...



Researchers discover 'bad' cholesterol contributes to cancer spread in the body


6 hours ago



(Medical Xpress)—In a world-first, University of Sydney researchers have discovered one of the main reasons behind why cancer spreads throughout the body - the help of 'bad' cholesterol.





A molecular target may lead to drug to fight leukaemia


6 hours ago



(Medical Xpress)—A molecular 'target' that could lead to a drug to fight leukaemia is in the sights of a team of University of Queensland researchers.



User comments








Categories:

0 comments:

Post a Comment