by John Hewitt 
Credit: Photo Researchers, Inc.
(Medical Xpress)—There is no mystery in the way that computers store information. It is straightforward to determine how much memory they have and what is contained in that memory. Brains don't really have memory in this traditional sense. What they do have, are various adaptive systems that give the appearance of a limited computer-like memory as a side-effect of their primary functions. Two papers that recently appeared in PNAS describe the use of fMRI to explore the limits of human memory. In particular, they address roles of category and context in determining if something might be remembered, or forgotten.
The first paper looked at memory performance when subjects were asked to remember several things at once. When the items to be recalled were from different categories—faces, bodies or other objects—the researchers found that the subjects did better. The scans revealed that the degree to which the mixed catagory recall was improved could be predicted by the degree to which the fMRI neural response patterns they obtained were also different.
The second study focused on recall performance when various objects appear in different contexts or scenes. Here the researchers found that when items don't appear in a context that is expected, the memory for that object is weakened. In this case it is hypothesized that the brain automatically prunes what it predetermines is an invlaid memory.
One major difference between our animal memory and say, Google's memory, is that while we constantly forget things, Google never does. On the other hand, while it is impossible for us to intentionally forget something on demand (at least while keeping everything else intact) Google could erase any specific memory it might so choose. Clearly in our case at least, all memories are not created equal. Despite that fact, we are neither jury nor judge of our own memories.
By it's own admission, in a typical search lasting 0.2 seconds Google consumes 0.3 Wh (roughly $0.0003 per search) for the whole job of indexing and retreiving the query. Based on the average adult requirement for 8000 kilojoules of food per day, Google concludes that a search is equivalent to the energy a person would burn in 10 seconds. If we take a simple task, for example the question, "Do you know X ?" what happens next inside our heads would put any Google search to shame.
The key thing in the two PNAS papers for us here is that category and context are not just incidentals of memory, they are memory. Without them there is no memory for us, and for Google, there is only a future of expontentiating storage requirements. Clearly there is more to life than text, audio, and video. The task ahead for computer engineers is to learn not just how to extract the outlines that define an image, but how to extract the outlines that define reality, and the events that occur within it.
If we are shown a face, as in the experiments done above, we can instaneously scan our whole history of existence to estimate whether we know it or not. We can also estimate whether we know their name within a few more micromoments. If the name is not recalled immediately, we would then attempt to summon it by creating additional context, quickly trying out sounds or images until one fits. Failing that, we can dig deeper into emotion and other meaningful contexts that draw forth how the face makes us feel, whether it might be someone favored or disfavored.
Failing all these efforts we might abandon hope at ever remembering the name. Only then we might paradoxically be given the perplexing experience of the name coming immediately to attention as another part of our brain that been earstwhile supressed in the effort had it there for us all along. If we are ever to build so-called memory implants that hope to do more good than harm, we will have to at least have an inkling as to how intact brains remember.
Explore further: New research shows memory is a dynamic and interactive process
More information: 1. Processing multiple visual objects is limited by overlap in neural channels, Michael A. Cohen, PNAS, 2014. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1317860111
2. Pruning of memories by context-based prediction error, Ghootae Kim, PNAS, 2014. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319438111
© 2014 Medical Xpress
Medical Xpress on facebook
Related Stories
New research shows memory is a dynamic and interactive process
May 28, 2014
Research presented by Morris Moscovitch, from the Rotman Research Institute at the University of Toronto, shows that memory is more dynamic and changeable than previously thought. Dr. Moscovich's results reveal that important ...
When it comes to memory, quality matters more than quantity
Feb 04, 2014
The capacity of our working memory is better explained by the quality of memories we can store than by their number, a team of psychology researchers has concluded.
What happened when? How the brain stores memories by time
Mar 12, 2014
(Medical Xpress)—Before I left the house this morning, I let the cat out and started the dishwasher. Or was that yesterday? Very often, our memories must distinguish not just what happened and where, but ...
Outside the body our memories fail us
Mar 10, 2014
New research from Karolinska Institutet and Umeå University demonstrates for the first time that there is a close relationship between body perception and the ability to remember. For us to be able to store ...
Reactivating memories during sleep: Memory rehearsal during sleep can make a big difference in remembering later
Apr 12, 2013
Why do some memories last a lifetime while others disappear quickly? A new study suggests that memories rehearsed, during either sleep or waking, can have an impact on memory consolidation and on what is remembered ...
Recommended for you
Stress hormone receptors localized in sweet taste cells
1 hour ago
According to new research from the Monell Center, receptors for stress-activated hormones have been localized in oral taste cells responsible for detection of sweet, umami, and bitter. The findings suggest ...
Researchers find spatial awareness shifts right as people fall asleep
1 hour ago
(Medical Xpress)—A team of researchers working at Cambridge University in the U.K. has found that spatial awareness shifts to the right when people are falling asleep. In their paper published in the journal ...
Brain signals link physical fitness to better language skills in kids
3 hours ago
Children who are physically fit have faster and more robust neuro-electrical brain responses during reading than their less-fit peers, researchers report.
Balancing strategy to lateral impact in a rat Rattus norregicus
3 hours ago
The balancing strategy to lateral impact in a rat is closely related to the striked position of the body. The research result can be inspired to improve the robustness of bionic robot. This was found by Dr. JI Aihong and ...
Neurobiologist Thomas Jessell to receive $500,000 Gruber Neuroscience Prize
6 hours ago
Thomas Jessell, PhD, the Claire Tow Professor of Motor Neuron Disorders in the Departments of Neuroscience and of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics at Columbia University, is the recipient of the 2014 Neuroscience Prize ...
No sign of 'obesity paradox' in obese patients with stroke
22 hours ago
Researchers found no evidence of an "obesity paradox" (some studies have suggested overweight or obese patients have lower mortality rates than underweight or normal weight patients) in patients with stroke.
User comments
© Medical Xpress 2011-2014, Science X network
by John Hewitt
Credit: Photo Researchers, Inc.
(Medical Xpress)—There is no mystery in the way that computers store information. It is straightforward to determine how much memory they have and what is contained in that memory. Brains don't really have memory in this traditional sense. What they do have, are various adaptive systems that give the appearance of a limited computer-like memory as a side-effect of their primary functions. Two papers that recently appeared in PNAS describe the use of fMRI to explore the limits of human memory. In particular, they address roles of category and context in determining if something might be remembered, or forgotten.
The first paper looked at memory performance when subjects were asked to remember several things at once. When the items to be recalled were from different categories—faces, bodies or other objects—the researchers found that the subjects did better. The scans revealed that the degree to which the mixed catagory recall was improved could be predicted by the degree to which the fMRI neural response patterns they obtained were also different.
The second study focused on recall performance when various objects appear in different contexts or scenes. Here the researchers found that when items don't appear in a context that is expected, the memory for that object is weakened. In this case it is hypothesized that the brain automatically prunes what it predetermines is an invlaid memory.
One major difference between our animal memory and say, Google's memory, is that while we constantly forget things, Google never does. On the other hand, while it is impossible for us to intentionally forget something on demand (at least while keeping everything else intact) Google could erase any specific memory it might so choose. Clearly in our case at least, all memories are not created equal. Despite that fact, we are neither jury nor judge of our own memories.
By it's own admission, in a typical search lasting 0.2 seconds Google consumes 0.3 Wh (roughly $0.0003 per search) for the whole job of indexing and retreiving the query. Based on the average adult requirement for 8000 kilojoules of food per day, Google concludes that a search is equivalent to the energy a person would burn in 10 seconds. If we take a simple task, for example the question, "Do you know X ?" what happens next inside our heads would put any Google search to shame.
The key thing in the two PNAS papers for us here is that category and context are not just incidentals of memory, they are memory. Without them there is no memory for us, and for Google, there is only a future of expontentiating storage requirements. Clearly there is more to life than text, audio, and video. The task ahead for computer engineers is to learn not just how to extract the outlines that define an image, but how to extract the outlines that define reality, and the events that occur within it.
If we are shown a face, as in the experiments done above, we can instaneously scan our whole history of existence to estimate whether we know it or not. We can also estimate whether we know their name within a few more micromoments. If the name is not recalled immediately, we would then attempt to summon it by creating additional context, quickly trying out sounds or images until one fits. Failing that, we can dig deeper into emotion and other meaningful contexts that draw forth how the face makes us feel, whether it might be someone favored or disfavored.
Failing all these efforts we might abandon hope at ever remembering the name. Only then we might paradoxically be given the perplexing experience of the name coming immediately to attention as another part of our brain that been earstwhile supressed in the effort had it there for us all along. If we are ever to build so-called memory implants that hope to do more good than harm, we will have to at least have an inkling as to how intact brains remember.
Explore further: New research shows memory is a dynamic and interactive process
More information: 1. Processing multiple visual objects is limited by overlap in neural channels, Michael A. Cohen, PNAS, 2014. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1317860111
2. Pruning of memories by context-based prediction error, Ghootae Kim, PNAS, 2014. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319438111
© 2014 Medical Xpress
Medical Xpress on facebook
Related Stories
New research shows memory is a dynamic and interactive process
May 28, 2014
Research presented by Morris Moscovitch, from the Rotman Research Institute at the University of Toronto, shows that memory is more dynamic and changeable than previously thought. Dr. Moscovich's results reveal that important ...
When it comes to memory, quality matters more than quantity
Feb 04, 2014
The capacity of our working memory is better explained by the quality of memories we can store than by their number, a team of psychology researchers has concluded.
What happened when? How the brain stores memories by time
Mar 12, 2014
(Medical Xpress)—Before I left the house this morning, I let the cat out and started the dishwasher. Or was that yesterday? Very often, our memories must distinguish not just what happened and where, but ...
Outside the body our memories fail us
Mar 10, 2014
New research from Karolinska Institutet and Umeå University demonstrates for the first time that there is a close relationship between body perception and the ability to remember. For us to be able to store ...
Reactivating memories during sleep: Memory rehearsal during sleep can make a big difference in remembering later
Apr 12, 2013
Why do some memories last a lifetime while others disappear quickly? A new study suggests that memories rehearsed, during either sleep or waking, can have an impact on memory consolidation and on what is remembered ...
Recommended for you
Stress hormone receptors localized in sweet taste cells
1 hour ago
According to new research from the Monell Center, receptors for stress-activated hormones have been localized in oral taste cells responsible for detection of sweet, umami, and bitter. The findings suggest ...
Researchers find spatial awareness shifts right as people fall asleep
1 hour ago
(Medical Xpress)—A team of researchers working at Cambridge University in the U.K. has found that spatial awareness shifts to the right when people are falling asleep. In their paper published in the journal ...
Brain signals link physical fitness to better language skills in kids
3 hours ago
Children who are physically fit have faster and more robust neuro-electrical brain responses during reading than their less-fit peers, researchers report.
Balancing strategy to lateral impact in a rat Rattus norregicus
3 hours ago
The balancing strategy to lateral impact in a rat is closely related to the striked position of the body. The research result can be inspired to improve the robustness of bionic robot. This was found by Dr. JI Aihong and ...
Neurobiologist Thomas Jessell to receive $500,000 Gruber Neuroscience Prize
6 hours ago
Thomas Jessell, PhD, the Claire Tow Professor of Motor Neuron Disorders in the Departments of Neuroscience and of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics at Columbia University, is the recipient of the 2014 Neuroscience Prize ...
No sign of 'obesity paradox' in obese patients with stroke
22 hours ago
Researchers found no evidence of an "obesity paradox" (some studies have suggested overweight or obese patients have lower mortality rates than underweight or normal weight patients) in patients with stroke.
User comments
© Medical Xpress 2011-2014, Science X network
0 comments:
Post a Comment