As the general election in the UK approaches, experts writing in The BMJ this week question whether the party promises on access to general practice are likely to be achievable.
Tom Cowling and colleagues at Imperial College London say pledges on the GP workforce "are unlikely to be achieved within a parliamentary term" and guarantees of an appointment within 48 hours "may prove unrealistic."
Access to general practice is a prominent issue in national policy debate ahead of the 2015 UK general election in May - and the two main parties, Conservative and Labour, have both made bold pledges on this topic, write the authors.
For example, the prime minister has declared that everyone in England will be able to see a general practitioner between 8 am and 8 pm, seven days a week, by 2020 if the Conservative Party is re-elected to government.
The government also plans for an extra 5,000 GPs and spending an additional £2bn on the frontline of the English NHS next year (currently there are 40,000 GPs and spending is £115bn). Meanwhile, the Labour Party aims to guarantee a GP appointment within 48 hours, a policy recycled from past Labour governments. Labour also intends to recruit 8,000 more GPs.
But the authors point out that the problem with access "has not been precisely defined; nor has the evidence behind pledges been made clear."
To gauge the problem of access, they analysed data from the GP Patient Survey - a national survey of patients' experiences - and found that in 2013-14, around 90% of attempts to get general practice appointments in England were successful.
The authors also question the aims of increased access, pointing out that although politicians may intend to improve satisfaction with primary care, data suggest patients are often willing to forgo quicker access in favour of other appointment characteristics (such as seeing a particular GP) that are highly valued.
Both parties also hypothesise that their policies will reduce attendances at emergency departments. But the authors argue that, although visits to such services increased from 17.8 million in 2004-05 to 21.8 million in 2013-14, "existing evidence on whether improving access to general practice reduces emergency department visits is inadequate to inform policy."
Politicians' promises of an extra 5,000 to 8,000 GPs are also likely to be challenging to achieve, they add.
They suggest five points of action for policy and research if improvements in access are pursued. These include evaluating the government's extended opening hours pilot scheme, discussing the skill mix in general practice to allow GPs to focus on complex care for the sickest patients, and evaluating new types of appointment, such as telephone and email consultations.
"The public should question the promises of politicians and policies should be independently evaluated before wide implementation," they conclude.
Explore further: Patients must not be forced to choose between easier access and continuity of care
More information: Evidence and rhetoric about access to UK primary care, The BMJ, http://ift.tt/1EzHqoU
Medical Xpress on facebook
Related Stories
Patients must not be forced to choose between easier access and continuity of care
RCGP says that reducing waiting times for a GP appointment must be a priority for politicians and the incoming government
Researchers estimate 5.8 million accident and emergency visits occur after patients unable to see a GP
Researchers have estimated that in 2012-2013 there were 5.77 million A&E attendances in England that were preceded by an inability to get a timely GP appointment.
More accident and emergency visits where access to GPs is worse
Patients with more timely access to GP appointments make fewer visits to accident and emergency departments, suggests a study published today.
Future GPs could benefit from longer training
Newly-qualified GPs could be better prepared for practice by increasing the variety and duration of their training programme, according to research being published in the April 2015 issue of the British Jo ...
UK medical schools are not attracting enough GPs
UK medical schools are not attracting enough would-be GPs, argues a senior academic in The BMJ this week.
Recommended for you
Governments can prevent tragic death toll of mothers and babies
Governments could substantially reduce the tragic death toll of infants and mothers by making postnatal care services more accessible - especially to impoverished and poorly educated women in rural areas, according to a study ...
Video: What's the difference between sugar and high-fructose corn syrup?
It seems like it's in just about every product on grocery store shelves: high-fructose corn syrup. What is it, and how is it different from regular old sugar? And how did it become such a popular but controversial ...
Chronic loneliness in older adults leads to more doctors' office visits, study finds
Experiences of loneliness and social isolation can lead to increased health care use among older adults, according to new research from the University of Georgia College of Public Health.
Benefits of iron supplements unclear for pregnant women, young children
(HealthDay)—Taking iron supplements during pregnancy doesn't appear to significantly change any health outcomes for mom or baby, a new review shows.
Staff attitudes impact extended treatment time on hemodialysis
(HealthDay)—Although most health care staff feel that extended treatment time on hemodialysis is beneficial, many nurses do not recommend it, according to a study published online March 16 in the Journal of ...
Domestic violence deters contraception
Domestic violence takes many forms. The control of a woman's reproductive choices by her partner is one of them. A major study published in PLOS One, led by McGill PhD student Lauren Maxwell, showed that women who are ab ...
User comments
Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more
Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.
As the general election in the UK approaches, experts writing in The BMJ this week question whether the party promises on access to general practice are likely to be achievable.
Tom Cowling and colleagues at Imperial College London say pledges on the GP workforce "are unlikely to be achieved within a parliamentary term" and guarantees of an appointment within 48 hours "may prove unrealistic."
Access to general practice is a prominent issue in national policy debate ahead of the 2015 UK general election in May - and the two main parties, Conservative and Labour, have both made bold pledges on this topic, write the authors.
For example, the prime minister has declared that everyone in England will be able to see a general practitioner between 8 am and 8 pm, seven days a week, by 2020 if the Conservative Party is re-elected to government.
The government also plans for an extra 5,000 GPs and spending an additional £2bn on the frontline of the English NHS next year (currently there are 40,000 GPs and spending is £115bn). Meanwhile, the Labour Party aims to guarantee a GP appointment within 48 hours, a policy recycled from past Labour governments. Labour also intends to recruit 8,000 more GPs.
But the authors point out that the problem with access "has not been precisely defined; nor has the evidence behind pledges been made clear."
To gauge the problem of access, they analysed data from the GP Patient Survey - a national survey of patients' experiences - and found that in 2013-14, around 90% of attempts to get general practice appointments in England were successful.
The authors also question the aims of increased access, pointing out that although politicians may intend to improve satisfaction with primary care, data suggest patients are often willing to forgo quicker access in favour of other appointment characteristics (such as seeing a particular GP) that are highly valued.
Both parties also hypothesise that their policies will reduce attendances at emergency departments. But the authors argue that, although visits to such services increased from 17.8 million in 2004-05 to 21.8 million in 2013-14, "existing evidence on whether improving access to general practice reduces emergency department visits is inadequate to inform policy."
Politicians' promises of an extra 5,000 to 8,000 GPs are also likely to be challenging to achieve, they add.
They suggest five points of action for policy and research if improvements in access are pursued. These include evaluating the government's extended opening hours pilot scheme, discussing the skill mix in general practice to allow GPs to focus on complex care for the sickest patients, and evaluating new types of appointment, such as telephone and email consultations.
"The public should question the promises of politicians and policies should be independently evaluated before wide implementation," they conclude.
Explore further: Patients must not be forced to choose between easier access and continuity of care
More information: Evidence and rhetoric about access to UK primary care, The BMJ, http://ift.tt/1EzHqoU
Medical Xpress on facebook
Related Stories
Patients must not be forced to choose between easier access and continuity of care
RCGP says that reducing waiting times for a GP appointment must be a priority for politicians and the incoming government
Researchers estimate 5.8 million accident and emergency visits occur after patients unable to see a GP
Researchers have estimated that in 2012-2013 there were 5.77 million A&E attendances in England that were preceded by an inability to get a timely GP appointment.
More accident and emergency visits where access to GPs is worse
Patients with more timely access to GP appointments make fewer visits to accident and emergency departments, suggests a study published today.
Future GPs could benefit from longer training
Newly-qualified GPs could be better prepared for practice by increasing the variety and duration of their training programme, according to research being published in the April 2015 issue of the British Jo ...
UK medical schools are not attracting enough GPs
UK medical schools are not attracting enough would-be GPs, argues a senior academic in The BMJ this week.
Recommended for you
Governments can prevent tragic death toll of mothers and babies
Governments could substantially reduce the tragic death toll of infants and mothers by making postnatal care services more accessible - especially to impoverished and poorly educated women in rural areas, according to a study ...
Video: What's the difference between sugar and high-fructose corn syrup?
It seems like it's in just about every product on grocery store shelves: high-fructose corn syrup. What is it, and how is it different from regular old sugar? And how did it become such a popular but controversial ...
Chronic loneliness in older adults leads to more doctors' office visits, study finds
Experiences of loneliness and social isolation can lead to increased health care use among older adults, according to new research from the University of Georgia College of Public Health.
Benefits of iron supplements unclear for pregnant women, young children
(HealthDay)—Taking iron supplements during pregnancy doesn't appear to significantly change any health outcomes for mom or baby, a new review shows.
Staff attitudes impact extended treatment time on hemodialysis
(HealthDay)—Although most health care staff feel that extended treatment time on hemodialysis is beneficial, many nurses do not recommend it, according to a study published online March 16 in the Journal of ...
Domestic violence deters contraception
Domestic violence takes many forms. The control of a woman's reproductive choices by her partner is one of them. A major study published in PLOS One, led by McGill PhD student Lauren Maxwell, showed that women who are ab ...
User comments
Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more
Click here
to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.
0 comments:
Post a Comment